2 10 44 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Douglas, David M Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2018-04-12 Description An account of the resource This commentary responds to the primary article by Åste Corbridge in this volume entitled ‘Responding to Doxing in Australia: Towards a Right to Informational Self-Determination?’. It discusses the way that concepts of ‘personal information’ and ‘identification information’ from the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) correspond with the seven crucial types of identity knowledge identified by Gary T Marx and argues that these statutory definitions should be expanded to offer better protection to victims of doxing in Australia. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1491 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1491/927 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2018 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol 3 (2017/2018): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource personal information identification information identity knowledge privacy act 1988 (Cth) protecting identity knowledge Title A name given to the resource Personal Information, Identification Information, and Identity Knowledge Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Crompton, Malcolm Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2018-04-12 Description An account of the resource This article provides a response to Åste Corbridge’s article entitled ‘Responding to Doxing in Australia: Towards a Right to Informational Self-determination’ and considers the solutions to the problems of doxing suggested in that article. It also considers whether Australia’s privacy laws need further reform and whether Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation would provide an appropriate model for a solution in Australia. It concludes that for any change to the law to have an impact, it must not only be complemented by social leadership and education, but must also be backed by enforcement and resources. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1490 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1490/926 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2018 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol 3 (2017/2018): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource doxing and privacy tort of privacy privacy commissioner general data protection regulation right to be forgotten enforcement Title A name given to the resource Doxing in Australia: A Practitioner's Perspective Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Corbridge, Åste Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2018-04-12 Description An account of the resource Doxing is the term used to describe the act of publicly revealing an individual’s personal information without their permission. It is a problem that concerns informational privacy and data protection. This article argues that the Australian Parliament should provide individuals with a right to informational self-determination and adopt a holistic approach to personal data protection. Part I defines the different aspects of doxing and identifies the adverse effects that doxing can have on victims. Part II considers the right to informational self-determination, before Part III examines solutions to the doxing problem. This article concludes that the Australian Parliament should consider enacting a statutory cause of action for a serious invasion of privacy that provides redress for doxing victims and introduces personal data protection regulations modelled on Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1489 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1489/924 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2018 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol 3 (2017/2018): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource doxing reform general data protection regulation personal information information privacy Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) statutory cause of action for serious invasion of privacy remedies informational self-determination Title A name given to the resource Responding to Doxing in Australia: Towards a Right to Informational Self-Determination Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Thompson, Elise Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource This comment responds to the primary article by Vanessa Deverson in this volume by giving some insights into the problem of mandatory reporting from the perspective of psychology. Parts I and II provide a survey of the legal and ethical requirements imposed on psychologists to report suspected child abuse and neglect. The article then moves on in Part III to discuss the way that psychologists balance the need to maintain client confidentiality with their duties to report. The article argues that lawyers should have the option to report child abuse and neglect, but warns that, before any reporting of child abuse and neglect can be successful, a vast improvement in the management of notifications is essential.  Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1364 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1364 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1364/886 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource mandatory reporting psychology child abuse neglect Title A name given to the resource Mandatory Notification of Child Abuse and Neglect: Perspectives From Psychology Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Caruso, David Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource This comment responds to Vanessa Deverson’s article titled ‘Child Abuse and Neglect: Mandatory Reporting and the Legal Profession’ and examines whether it is desirable for lawyers to be required to report child abuse and neglect that may be revealed by their clients. The comment begins by articulating the role of the legal profession, and explains how it differs from other professions. Part I explains that an obligation to report child abuse would fundamentally change the role of the legal profession in defending or asserting the rights, liberties and liabilities of their clients. Part II argues that even if mandatory reporting were to be brought in, it would be unlikely achieve its intended purpose because it would create suspicion towards the legal profession and undermine its role. The final Part discusses current South Australian draft legislation aimed at protecting children and argues that this may be a more appropriate route. The comment concludes that current Northern Territory reporting laws do not belong in a legal system that depends on clients having confidence in their lawyers. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1363 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1363 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1363/887 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource mandatory reporting child abuse ethics confidence Title A name given to the resource Response to Vanessa Deverson On 'Child Abuse And Neglect: Mandatory Reporting And The Legal Profession' Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Atkinson, Matthew Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource This article comments on Vanessa Deverson’s article in this volume entitled ‘Child Abuse and Neglect: Mandatory Reporting and the Legal Profession’ which argues that lawyers should be mandated to report suspected child abuse and neglect. It argues that lawyers should not be required to report suspicions of child abuse or neglect. Part I offers a reflection on Deverson’s argument and Part II offers guidance on how lawyers should proceed in a responsible and ethical manner when confronted with child abuse and neglect. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1362 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1362 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1362/888 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource mandatory reporting child abuse legal profession ethics Title A name given to the resource Why Lawyers Should Not Be Mandated Reporters Of Child Abuse Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Deverson, Vanessa Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource Child abuse and neglect affects approximately 42 500 children in Australia each year. Parliaments in all Australian states and territories have introduced mandatory reporting into child protection legislation to protect vulnerable children by requiring certain individuals to report suspicions of abuse or neglect. However, lawyers are prevented from reporting because of the rules governing legal professional privilege and confidentiality. This article begins by examining the problem of child abuse and neglect in Australia and outlines the current legislative framework of mandatory reporting laws in Part II. Part III discusses the current rules governing lawyers and examines legal professional privilege and the duty of confidentiality. Part IV provides arguments for and against requiring lawyers to report suspected abuse and also considers the lawyer-client relationship and the special position of domestic violence victims. Part V offers recommendations for the proposed legislative reform. This article concludes that lawyers should be required to report child abuse and neglect. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1361 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1361 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1361/889 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource mandatory reporting child abuse legal profession duty of confidentiality Title A name given to the resource Child Abuse And Neglect: Mandatory Reporting and the Legal Profession Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Kirchengast, Tyrone Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource This comment is a response to Alyse Dickson’s article in this volume entitled ‘Revenge Porn: A Victim Focused Response’. Part I considers the challenges that ‘revenge pornography’ raises and considers the difficulties of controlling aberrant sexualised conduct in circumstances where modern technology provides an almost limitless capacity to capture and distribute private images. Part II looks at the wider socio-cultural context, the gendered and sexualised assumptions of hetero-normativity and warns of the risks of overlooking ‘hidden’ individuals or groups that do not align with normative discourses of the ideal victim. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1360 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1360 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1360/890 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource revenge pornography socio-cultural context hetero-normativity digital technology Title A name given to the resource The Limits of Criminal Law And Justice ‘Revenge Porn’ Criminalisation, Hybrid Responses, And The Ideal Victim Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Plater, David Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource The complex contemporary issue of revenge pornography has attracted extensive media, law reform and academic commentary and concern, especially as to the perceived failures of both the civil and criminal law to keep up to date with social and technological changes and to adequately respond to this issue. This article considers the existing remedies under the criminal law to revenge pornography and examines the Summary Offences (Filming and Sexting Offences) Amendment Act 2016 (SA) that came into operation on 28 October 2016. The new Act updates and strengthens the criminal law in South Australia in this area. This article notes that the criminal law is not the exclusive means to address revenge pornography and that there is a need for a wider approach that includes effective civil legal remedies and education and cultural change. However, the criminal law still has a vital role to play in setting the boundaries of acceptable modern behaviour. In this light, it is argued that the new South Australian Act is a timely and welcome legislative addition in addressing revenge pornography. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1359 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1359 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1359/891 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource revenge pornography reform criminal law south australia legislation Title A name given to the resource ‘Setting The Boundaries Of Acceptable Behaviour’? South Australia's Latest Legislative Response To Revenge Pornography Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Henry, Nicola Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource This comment responds to Alyse Dickson’s article in this volume titled ‘Revenge Porn: A Victim Focused Response’. It summarises the difficulty that Australian law has encountered in keeping up with evolving behaviours with emergent digital technologies and provides recommendations for achieving the ‘victim focused response’ that Dickson argues for in her article. The comment begins in Part I by highlighting the problems caused by the term ‘revenge pornography’. Part II explores possible directions for future research and stresses the need for an interdisciplinary approach for any strategy to be truly effective. The comment concludes by arguing that a formal legal response in the form of criminal legislation in all jurisdictions should be implemented. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1358 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1358 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1358/892 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource revenge porn criminal legislation reform Title A name given to the resource Henry Responds To Dickson: ‘Revenge Porn’: A Victim Focused Response Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion