309 10 3575 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Kirchengast, Tyrone Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource This comment is a response to Alyse Dickson’s article in this volume entitled ‘Revenge Porn: A Victim Focused Response’. Part I considers the challenges that ‘revenge pornography’ raises and considers the difficulties of controlling aberrant sexualised conduct in circumstances where modern technology provides an almost limitless capacity to capture and distribute private images. Part II looks at the wider socio-cultural context, the gendered and sexualised assumptions of hetero-normativity and warns of the risks of overlooking ‘hidden’ individuals or groups that do not align with normative discourses of the ideal victim. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1360 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1360 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1360/890 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource revenge pornography socio-cultural context hetero-normativity digital technology Title A name given to the resource The Limits of Criminal Law And Justice ‘Revenge Porn’ Criminalisation, Hybrid Responses, And The Ideal Victim Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Deverson, Vanessa Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource Child abuse and neglect affects approximately 42 500 children in Australia each year. Parliaments in all Australian states and territories have introduced mandatory reporting into child protection legislation to protect vulnerable children by requiring certain individuals to report suspicions of abuse or neglect. However, lawyers are prevented from reporting because of the rules governing legal professional privilege and confidentiality. This article begins by examining the problem of child abuse and neglect in Australia and outlines the current legislative framework of mandatory reporting laws in Part II. Part III discusses the current rules governing lawyers and examines legal professional privilege and the duty of confidentiality. Part IV provides arguments for and against requiring lawyers to report suspected abuse and also considers the lawyer-client relationship and the special position of domestic violence victims. Part V offers recommendations for the proposed legislative reform. This article concludes that lawyers should be required to report child abuse and neglect. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1361 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1361 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1361/889 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource mandatory reporting child abuse legal profession duty of confidentiality Title A name given to the resource Child Abuse And Neglect: Mandatory Reporting and the Legal Profession Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Atkinson, Matthew Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource This article comments on Vanessa Deverson’s article in this volume entitled ‘Child Abuse and Neglect: Mandatory Reporting and the Legal Profession’ which argues that lawyers should be mandated to report suspected child abuse and neglect. It argues that lawyers should not be required to report suspicions of child abuse or neglect. Part I offers a reflection on Deverson’s argument and Part II offers guidance on how lawyers should proceed in a responsible and ethical manner when confronted with child abuse and neglect. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1362 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1362 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1362/888 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource mandatory reporting child abuse legal profession ethics Title A name given to the resource Why Lawyers Should Not Be Mandated Reporters Of Child Abuse Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Caruso, David Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource This comment responds to Vanessa Deverson’s article titled ‘Child Abuse and Neglect: Mandatory Reporting and the Legal Profession’ and examines whether it is desirable for lawyers to be required to report child abuse and neglect that may be revealed by their clients. The comment begins by articulating the role of the legal profession, and explains how it differs from other professions. Part I explains that an obligation to report child abuse would fundamentally change the role of the legal profession in defending or asserting the rights, liberties and liabilities of their clients. Part II argues that even if mandatory reporting were to be brought in, it would be unlikely achieve its intended purpose because it would create suspicion towards the legal profession and undermine its role. The final Part discusses current South Australian draft legislation aimed at protecting children and argues that this may be a more appropriate route. The comment concludes that current Northern Territory reporting laws do not belong in a legal system that depends on clients having confidence in their lawyers. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1363 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1363 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1363/887 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource mandatory reporting child abuse ethics confidence Title A name given to the resource Response to Vanessa Deverson On 'Child Abuse And Neglect: Mandatory Reporting And The Legal Profession' Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Thompson, Elise Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-12-10 Description An account of the resource This comment responds to the primary article by Vanessa Deverson in this volume by giving some insights into the problem of mandatory reporting from the perspective of psychology. Parts I and II provide a survey of the legal and ethical requirements imposed on psychologists to report suspected child abuse and neglect. The article then moves on in Part III to discuss the way that psychologists balance the need to maintain client confidentiality with their duties to report. The article argues that lawyers should have the option to report child abuse and neglect, but warns that, before any reporting of child abuse and neglect can be successful, a vast improvement in the management of notifications is essential.  Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1364 10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v2i0.1364 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1364/886 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2016 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol. 2 (2016): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource mandatory reporting psychology child abuse neglect Title A name given to the resource Mandatory Notification of Child Abuse and Neglect: Perspectives From Psychology Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Corbridge, Åste Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2018-04-12 Description An account of the resource Doxing is the term used to describe the act of publicly revealing an individual’s personal information without their permission. It is a problem that concerns informational privacy and data protection. This article argues that the Australian Parliament should provide individuals with a right to informational self-determination and adopt a holistic approach to personal data protection. Part I defines the different aspects of doxing and identifies the adverse effects that doxing can have on victims. Part II considers the right to informational self-determination, before Part III examines solutions to the doxing problem. This article concludes that the Australian Parliament should consider enacting a statutory cause of action for a serious invasion of privacy that provides redress for doxing victims and introduces personal data protection regulations modelled on Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1489 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1489/924 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2018 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol 3 (2017/2018): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource doxing reform general data protection regulation personal information information privacy Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) statutory cause of action for serious invasion of privacy remedies informational self-determination Title A name given to the resource Responding to Doxing in Australia: Towards a Right to Informational Self-Determination Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Crompton, Malcolm Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2018-04-12 Description An account of the resource This article provides a response to Åste Corbridge’s article entitled ‘Responding to Doxing in Australia: Towards a Right to Informational Self-determination’ and considers the solutions to the problems of doxing suggested in that article. It also considers whether Australia’s privacy laws need further reform and whether Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation would provide an appropriate model for a solution in Australia. It concludes that for any change to the law to have an impact, it must not only be complemented by social leadership and education, but must also be backed by enforcement and resources. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1490 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1490/926 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2018 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol 3 (2017/2018): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource doxing and privacy tort of privacy privacy commissioner general data protection regulation right to be forgotten enforcement Title A name given to the resource Doxing in Australia: A Practitioner's Perspective Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Douglas, David M Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2018-04-12 Description An account of the resource This commentary responds to the primary article by Åste Corbridge in this volume entitled ‘Responding to Doxing in Australia: Towards a Right to Informational Self-Determination?’. It discusses the way that concepts of ‘personal information’ and ‘identification information’ from the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) correspond with the seven crucial types of identity knowledge identified by Gary T Marx and argues that these statutory definitions should be expanded to offer better protection to victims of doxing in Australia. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1491 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1491/927 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2018 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol 3 (2017/2018): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource personal information identification information identity knowledge privacy act 1988 (Cth) protecting identity knowledge Title A name given to the resource Personal Information, Identification Information, and Identity Knowledge Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Stone, Jake Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2018-04-12 Description An account of the resource This article provides a response to the article in this volume entitled ‘Responding to Doxing in Australia: Towards a Right to Information Self-determination?’ by Åste Corbridge. It begins in Part I by considering some of the elements which might be included in a statutory tort of serious invasion of privacy modelled on the EU General Data Protection Regulations. Part II considers the legal protection currently afforded to freedom of expression in Australia. Part III argues that we should proceed with caution because the proposed elements have serious implications for freedom of expression. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1493 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1493/928 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2018 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol 3 (2017/2018): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource statutory tort serious invasion of privacy legal protection free expression Title A name given to the resource Informational Self-Determination and Freedom of Expression Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of South Australia Law Review Dataset Data encoded in a defined structure. Examples include lists, tables, and databases. A dataset may be useful for direct machine processing. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Lazar, Alex Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2018-04-12 Description An account of the resource Internet facilitated home-sharing services like Airbnb present new  challenges for South Australian law because they appear to create seemingly novel legal relationships. This article considers whether South Australian law adequately protects the rights of hosts, guests and neighbours who are affected by home-sharing agreements. It argues, first, that home-sharing is currently a legal activity and land use in most of South Australia; secondly, that the relationships between host and guest are capable of being recognised under residential tenancy and property law; and thirdly, that while current legislation protects home-sharing neighbours living in strata housing, the law of private nuisance is not capable of protecting the rest. This article concludes that the rights of the host and guest are capable of being recognised and regulated by existing domestic law; however, it suggests that local councils should set up home-sharing complaints systems to protect neighbours. Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1494 Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of South Australia Relation A related resource https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/uslr/article/view/1494/929 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Copyright (c) 2018 UniSA Student Law Review Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived University of South Australia Law Review; Vol 3 (2017/2018): UniSA Student Law Review 2206-1398 Subject The topic of the resource home-sharing regulation host guests and neighbours strata title land use private nuisance local council Title A name given to the resource Home-Sharing in South Australia: Protecting the Rights of Hosts, Guests, and Neighbours Type The nature or genre of the resource info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion