Indian Courts and Social Change: A Case Study of the Doctrine of Informed Consent in Medical Law and Ethics

Indian Courts and Social Change: A Case Study of the Doctrine of Informed Consent in Medical Law and Ethics

Doctrine of informed consent

Social change

Courts in India

Bodily autonomy

Law and ethics introduction

The doctrine of informed consent in medical law andethics has a strong grounding in the principle of bodilyautonomy and self-determination of human beings. Thisemphasis on the freedom of every individual to decidewhat is best for his/her body and health has led to severalcontroversies in the area of medical law and ethics inIndia and abroad, especially in the United Kingdom.Being a legal and ethical doctrine, „informed consent‟ hasbeen discarded, accepted, modified and emulated byvarious judgments of courts. This paper will examine theingenuity of courts in bringing about social change byupholding patient autonomy and adopting the doctrine ofinformed consent in the UK. However, this doctrine hasbeen rejected by the Indian Supreme Court, citing thereason that Indian citizens are unprepared and illequippedto understand the complexities of medicaltreatment and procedures. This view, in the author‟sopinion, is a missed opportunity for the Indian SupremeCourt to bring about social change by upholding patientrights and autonomy.

Chatur, Dharmendra

Artha Journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 11 No. 4 (2012): Artha Journal of Social Sciences; 33-47

0000-0000

0975-329X

Centre for Publications, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore

2012-10-01

Copyright (c) 2016 Artha - Journal of Social Sciences

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

application/pdf

eng

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Peer-reviewed Article

Text