The Legal and Scientific Challenge of Black Box Expertise

Dublin Core

Title

The Legal and Scientific Challenge of Black Box Expertise

Description

Legal commentators widely agree that forensic examiners should articulate the reasons for their opinions. However, findings from cognitive science strongly suggest that people have little insight into the information they rely on to make decisions. And as individuals gain expertise, they rely more on cognitive shortcuts that are not directly accessible through introspection. That is to say, the expert’s mind is a black box — both to the expert and to the trier of fact. This article focuses on black box expertise in the context of forensic examiners who interpret visual pattern evidence (eg fingerprints). The authors review black box expertise through the lens of cognitive scientific research. They then suggest that the black box nature of this expertise strains common law admissibility rules and trial safeguards.

Creator

Searston, Rachel
Chin, Jason

Source

The University of Queensland Law Journal; Vol. 38 No. 2 (2019): Special issue on expert evidence; 237-260
1839-289X
0083-4041
10.38127/uqlj.v38i2

Publisher

The University of Queensland School of Law

Date

2020-02-18

Rights

Copyright (c) 2020 The University of Queensland Law Journal

Relation

Format

application/pdf

Language

eng

Type

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article

Identifier

Citation

Rachel Searston and Jason Chin, The Legal and Scientific Challenge of Black Box Expertise, The University of Queensland School of Law, 2020, accessed November 2, 2024, https://igi.indrastra.com/items/show/2622

Social Bookmarking