The Legal and Scientific Challenge of Black Box Expertise
Dublin Core
Title
The Legal and Scientific Challenge of Black Box Expertise
Description
Legal commentators widely agree that forensic examiners should articulate the reasons for their opinions. However, findings from cognitive science strongly suggest that people have little insight into the information they rely on to make decisions. And as individuals gain expertise, they rely more on cognitive shortcuts that are not directly accessible through introspection. That is to say, the expert’s mind is a black box — both to the expert and to the trier of fact. This article focuses on black box expertise in the context of forensic examiners who interpret visual pattern evidence (eg fingerprints). The authors review black box expertise through the lens of cognitive scientific research. They then suggest that the black box nature of this expertise strains common law admissibility rules and trial safeguards.
Creator
Searston, Rachel
Chin, Jason
Source
The University of Queensland Law Journal; Vol. 38 No. 2 (2019): Special issue on expert evidence; 237-260
1839-289X
0083-4041
10.38127/uqlj.v38i2
Publisher
The University of Queensland School of Law
Date
2020-02-18
Rights
Copyright (c) 2020 The University of Queensland Law Journal
Relation
Format
application/pdf
Language
eng
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Identifier
Collection
Citation
Rachel Searston and Jason Chin, The Legal and Scientific Challenge of Black Box Expertise, The University of Queensland School of Law, 2020, accessed November 2, 2024, https://igi.indrastra.com/items/show/2622