Judicial Activism and Constitutional (Mis) Interpretation: A Critical Appraisal

Judicial Activism and Constitutional (Mis) Interpretation: A Critical Appraisal

In this article, the authors explore the concept of judicial activism and its application in the Australian domestic cases of Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth and Love v Commonwealth, and in the US case of Obergefell v Hodges. The article highlights the devastating effects of judicial activism on legal interpretation, arguing that such activism compromises the doctrine of separation of powers and affects the realisation of the rule of law, resulting in a method ofinterpretation that incorporates personal biases and political opinion, thus ignoring the original intent of the framers of the Australian Constitution. Moreover, the article highlights that implementing a federal Bill of Rights might further exacerbate these ongoing problems concerning judicial activism in Australia.

M Sakr, Johnny

Zimmermann, Augusto

The University of Queensland Law Journal; Vol. 40 No. 1 (2021): The University of Queensland Law Journal; 119-148

1839-289X

0083-4041

10.38127/uqlj.v40i1

The University of Queensland School of Law

2021-03-26

Copyright (c) 2021 The University of Queensland Law Journal

application/pdf

eng

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Peer-reviewed Article