Attacking the 'New Right', Australian Law Reviews and the Peer Review Process

Dublin Core

Title

Attacking the 'New Right', Australian Law Reviews and the Peer Review Process

Description

In a just published issue in one of Australia’s oldest and best-known law reviews, the Federal Law Review, Dr Harry Hobbs of the University of Technology Sydney has written an article that comes out swinging (read on to see that that is, if anything, a mild description) against critics of three High Court of Australia cases. The three judgments are separated by 28 years in total, but Hobbs lumps them — or rather various critics of any one of these three decisions — together as part of a supposedly coherent and like-minded whole. I am one of those thus lumped, which is why I am taking the time to offer up this brief reply, though there are dozens of others also so categorised.

Creator

Allan, James

Source

The University of Queensland Law Journal; Forthcoming Articles
1839-289X
0083-4041

Publisher

The University of Queensland School of Law

Date

2023-03-07

Rights

Copyright (c) 2023 The University of Queensland Law Journal

Relation

Format

application/pdf

Language

eng

Type

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Identifier

Citation

James Allan, Attacking the 'New Right', Australian Law Reviews and the Peer Review Process, The University of Queensland School of Law, 2023, accessed November 21, 2024, https://igi.indrastra.com/items/show/2692

Social Bookmarking